You don't actually own it
The vendor holds the code and the cloud accounts, and almost nothing is written down. Their rates go up every year. Moving to someone else means starting again from scratch, so you stay and keep paying.

What I do
Three questions decide every software project: Is there a real outcome worth chasing? Do we know exactly what it is? Do we have the skill to reach it?
My job is making all three a yes before you spend real money.
Book introduction callSome brands I've worked with
Most software builds fail for one reason: distance. Distance between the people building the software and the business it's for. The people writing the code don't understand your business, and nobody on your side can tell whether the work is any good. Six months and a lot of money later, the thing doesn't work and nobody's accountable.
The vendor holds the code and the cloud accounts, and almost nothing is written down. Their rates go up every year. Moving to someone else means starting again from scratch, so you stay and keep paying.
The quote was based on a spec written before anyone properly understood the problem. So everything you learn along the way gets treated as a change and gets a price attached. By month three you're negotiating with your own supplier instead of building anything.
In every meeting it looks nearly finished. Then you look underneath and there's no proper login security, nothing handles errors, and the database falls over with your first customer. That last stretch is where most of the real work sits, which is why a project can sit at 90% done for a year.
Someone non-technical signs off the build and the vendor marks its own homework. When they say it's nearly ready, you have no way of knowing. Every other problem on this list gets worse when this is the situation.
You got a price for the app. You didn't get a price for connecting it to your finance system, your customer database, and the thing from 2009 that still runs the warehouse. Those connections often cost more than the app did. It's a mid-market problem, mostly, since startups have nothing to plug into yet.
Every department asked for something and it all got built. Eighteen months later nothing has been in front of a real user, and the assumptions it was scoped on have changed. It launches, and people just don't use it.
One contractor or one employee understands how the whole system works. When they leave, or come back asking for more money, you find out you don't own a system. You're paying for access to a person.
Very common with AI projects at the moment. The proof of concept works beautifully, then it hits security review, or the data turns out to be a mess, or nobody worked out who was supposed to change how they do their job. It gets written up as a success and then sits there.
MY TRACK RECORD
Angela Bevitt-Parr
National Marketing Manager
AWS Australia
Tim Buric
Chief Technology Officer
Agilyx & MUNIvers
Kelvin Kenney
Chief Executive Officer
Bow Wow Meow
How to start working with me
If we go ahead, you get a fractional CTO on your leadership team, and an engineering team behind me if you haven't got one of your own. You'll get the systems, skills, and structures a product company should run on, from day one.

Bring the project, the quote, or the thing that's stuck. There's no prep needed and no pitch coming.
Book introduction callTestimonials
"Sam took the time to understand our business and knew all the tech we needed… He and his team acted as an extension of our team."


After the call, I send you a written plan: what to build first, what to leave out, what it should roughly cost, and what to look for in any quote already on your desk. Plain language, specific to your business, and yours to keep even if we never speak again.

Take the plan to another builder if you like. Or we keep going together: with your team if you have one, or my team of 26 engineers if you don't.
Here's exactly what you get with me as your Fractional CTO.
I decide what's in and what's out, I lead the build, your team (or mine) writes the code. One person is accountable for all of it, and you're looking at him.
We build the smallest version that proves the business works. After that, every new feature has to earn its place against how people actually use it.
Software only counts if people actually use it. We design around how your customers and team really work, then test it with them. Good-looking matters. Getting used matters more.
All software breaks eventually. When yours does, you ring someone who already knows how it's built. We monitor it, so we usually spot problems before your customers do — and a fix comes with an explanation.
Security is built in from the first commit, not bolted on before launch. Access controls, encrypted data, and a record of who did what. When your biggest customer sends over their security questionnaire, you'll have the answers.
Built to handle ten times the traffic you have today. We test it under real-world pressure before launch, so it's ready when growth comes.
If a machine can do the job, we let it. Where AI actually helps, we use it — and where it's just fashion, I'll say so. Every automation has to save you hours or money, or it doesn't ship.
The code, accounts, infrastructure, documentation — in your name from day one. If you ever want to take it elsewhere, you can, and nothing has to be untangled first.
FAQ
Day rates for embedded engineers and my fractional CTO time, or a scoped phase price where the work suits it.
You do. Everything we build for you belongs to your business.
Yes, a meaningful share of our engagements start as rescues or take-overs.
Scoping within days. Engineering start is typically weeks and not months.
It varies. Some engagements are project-based with a clear end point. Others are ongoing because the company needs a permanent fractional CTO, not just someone to fix a specific problem. We work that out at the start based on what the company needs, and adjust as things change.
It varies, but the most common situations are: a technology project that's drifted without a leader steering it, a business that's scaling and realises it needs technical leadership it doesn't have, or a founder who needs someone to take technical decisions off their plate.
The engagements in these case studies range from straightforward to complicated: enterprise transformations, failing builds, businesses with no technical foundation at all. If you're not sure whether your situation fits, the easiest thing to do is get in touch and describe what's going on. Sam will give you a straight answer.
The industries vary, but the problems don't. Whether it's a logistics business, a pet insurance company, or a civil construction company, the issues that brought Sam in were almost always the same: no technical leader accountable for the outcome, engineers without proper direction, or technology decisions being made by the wrong people. The context changes, but the fix is usually the same.
Sydney, working with clients across Australia.
Any organisation that is making significant technology decisions and needs someone senior enough to make them well. Some have engineering teams already, some don't. Some are mid-project, some are just starting. The common thread is they need a technical leader who's accountable for the outcome.
You get the same level of judgment, experience, and accountability without the full-time salary, equity, or long-term commitment. It works particularly well for organisations that are about to start a significant technology project, need someone to lead an existing team, or want senior technical lead.
You're primarily getting me as your fractional CTO, someone who's accountable for your technology. If there's building to do and you don't have engineers to do it, I can bring my own team. But that's an add-on, not a requirement.
Ready?


The most expensive mistakes in a software project happen before anyone writes code. This call is how you avoid them.